hostages: Céline Pina’s reaction to President Macron’s tweet

This tweet is shameful: in the name of what should the mention of the hostages be accompanied by pledges given to the Islamists?

The death of civilians is unfortunate, but there is a difference between the horrors of a pogrom, the raiding of slaves and the stolen corpses that follow, and the consequences of a bombing. There is a difference between a crime against humanity and the war that results from it. As a Westerner, how does this man believe that the Islamists will treat us if they ever have the means? Just like the Jews on October 7th.
The equal sign drawn between Israel and Gaza implies a refusal to distinguish an imperfect democracy from the equivalent of Daesh. Now ask yourself: in your opinion, for your children to have a future, who would you prefer as a neighbor? Israel or Gaza?
Even Hamas explained that it did not know where half of the hostages were because the population was holding them. It must be said that these have been completely conditioned and fanaticized, to the point that even the Arab countries, who only have Palestine on their lips, do not want to welcome the Palestinians. They demonstrated it again when they are not ashamed to cry genocide while keeping their borders closed. The hatred which constitutes the way of being in the world of these populations, nourished by Islamist violence, is a repellent for Muslim states.
It is the same hatred that inhabits this type of population that the Islamists and LFI want to establish in France. They already have some pretty seedlings. Hence the speech on the intifada which resonates in the streets of Paris and the designations of support for the genocide to begin a list of victims to be designated for Jihad.
This ridiculous tweet which puts everything into perspective is vile politicking. The hostages deserved not to be mixed up with other considerations. They are the testimony of a barbarity which is already accepted and not fought by those on whom it can fall. We.
Decryption:
1. There is no “unjustifiable ordeal” for anyone other than the Jewish slaves raided by the Gazans. Hamas and the Gazans (remember that the civilian population followed in Hamas’ footsteps to rape and take hostages after the first massacres) committed a crime against humanity by attacking defenseless civilian populations because they were Jewish. The war that followed was legitimate and was not excessively deadly considering the particular situation and the number of civilians killed in other conflicts. The term genocide is therefore false. However, the “unjustifiable ordeal” is the hypocritical way of supporting the discourse on genocide.
2. Let him keep to himself his hypocritical “thoughts” about Ohad and Ofer about whom he never cared. If he and his little fellow leaders had an ounce of honor and a sense of sovereignty, they would:
– refuted the term hostages and spoke of slaves.
– immediately withdraws all aid to the Palestinians and cuts funding to UNRWA
– reaffirmed their support for Israel
– stopped repeating the Islamists’ narrative: illegitimacy of Israel, false accusations of occupation, false accusations of genocide, dehumanization of Jews
– fought Islamist leprosy on their own soil and condemned Hamas supporters in universities in particular for their inhumanity.

Finally the last hypocrisy: the political solution. To negotiate with whom? The Arab countries are not capable of denouncing the crime committed on October 7 and are screaming genocide even though they know it is false to satisfy their fanaticized inhabitants. The leaders are probably less anti-Semitic than the Arab street, but in the end they support this hatred because it is cultural and rooted. Hamas is not destroyed and in terms of raw anti-Semitism, the Palestinian Authority has nothing to envy it.
At the end what are we talking about? Of people who hold slaves whom they have killed or mistreated, whom they are capable of making alive or dead, because they even kidnap the dead to go after the bodies and make mourning impossible. And at this level of horror they allow themselves to be released in dribs and drabs? And do we accept? And we continue to finance them? But when we behave so much like puppets with psychopathic fanatics who only know the balance of power, do we really believe we are charting a path? Of the thousands of Palestinian terrorists who will be released, how many will come to shed blood here and there?
I would have liked for once, our president to be able to stand alongside the hostages. This inability to keep a clear line from those who believe themselves to be in the camp of Good and who end up feeding the worst totalitarianism (here Islamism) explains why people end up giving credit to Donald Trump whose profile as a savior does not is however not obvious… The proof, he had boasted of bringing back all the hostages before his inauguration. He wasn’t able to do it. Big mouth, small arm too?

Céline Pina Author, journalist (talker)

JForum.fr