Los Angeles fires: ‘That’s all I had,’ the panic of uninsured victims

Los Angeles fires: ‘That’s all I had,’ the panic of uninsured victims
Los Angeles fires: ‘That’s all I had,’ the panic of uninsured victims

Faced with the ruins of his house razed by the flames, Sebastian Harrison has no illusions. “This place will never be the same again,” breathes this Malibu resident without home insurance. “I knew it was risky, but I had no choice,” confides to theAFP the entrepreneur, hit by the crisis in the insurance market in California. Before the deadly fires which are still ravaging Los Angeles and its surroundings, this fifty-year-old had a “paradise” at the gates of the American megalopolis: his house on the side of the mountains, flanked by several outbuildings, overlooked the Pacific Ocean.

But private insurers, worried about the fire risk, never wanted to cover it. For more than ten years, Sebastian Harrison had to rely on the public insurance system, whose premiums were constantly increasing. When the bill approached $40,000 annually after the pandemic, compared to $8,000 in 2010, he finally gave up all coverage. “It’s not like I bought a luxury car instead of taking out insurance, it’s just that feeding me and my family was more important,” he says.

For the ex-actor, the fires turned into a nightmare. “I’m very worried because this property is all I had,” he says, hoping for federal aid. The United States “bailed out the banks during the financial crisis, then subsidized people during Covid, so we have to hope,” he sighs.

The Most Expensive Fires in American History

Sebastian Harrison is far from being an isolated case: in California, ravaged by multiple fires over the last 15 years, insuring your home has become a real obstacle course. Because the democratic policies adopted to limit prices have turned against the population: prevented from setting their prices freely, insurers have folded in the face of climate risks. The latest example, State Farm, one of the giants of the sector, announced in March the termination of around 30,000 home insurance contracts.

In the midst of this exodus, the fires ravaging Los Angeles in the middle of January reinforce the image of a California that is unreliable in the face of global warming. The destruction will cost tens of billions of dollars and many experts predict they will be the most expensive fires in American history. Because in the upscale neighborhood of Pacific Palisades, a celebrity haunt engulfed by flames, the average price of a house is 3.5 million euros.

Enough to worry the authorities. Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, who had just introduced major reforms at the end of 2024, openly doubts that they will be enough to stabilize the market. “I no longer know, because (…) my greatest fear was that we would suffer a catastrophe of this nature,” he admitted on Saturday to the San Francisco Chronicle. Even the public insurance system, designed for owners excluded by the private sector, seems on the verge of implosion.

-

Exodus of insurers

Called FAIR, it was created in 1968 as a temporary solution. But with the exodus of the private sector, the number of homes it covers has increased drastically in recent years. However, it only has $200 million in reserve in its coffers, an amount well below the expected losses in Pacific Palisades, where it insured many individuals.

To prevent the crisis from worsening, California has just decreed a moratorium prohibiting insurers from terminating contracts in areas affected by the fires for one year. A respite far from relieving Gabrielle Gottlieb, whose house in Pacific Palisades survived the flames. “My insurer has canceled many of my friends in recent months and I am afraid that he will let me down too,” explains this 60-year-old artist. “Basically, we are already being told: ‘good luck beyond a year!’”.

Added to these fears is the announced explosion in insurance premiums due to recent reforms adopted. To stem the flight of insurers, California will grant them greater pricing freedom. In exchange for their return to areas with a high fire risk, they will be able to set their prices by evaluating the risk of future damage, necessarily higher than the history of past losses used until now. “Real estate and taxes are already very high in California,” sighs Robert Spoeri, a Pacific Palisades owner let go by his private insurer in September. “If insurance goes up again, who is going to be able to live in this state?”

Curious to find out who’s making the news The essentials? Join us on the number 1 business network in Luxembourg!

(afp/er)

-

--

PREV Australian Open – Still heroic, Gaël Monfils forced to retire
NEXT Blue Monday, a marketing scam? “I was recruited by an advertising agency,” says its inventor