Prominent MAGA figures have accused Elon Musk for wanting to silence those who criticize his opinions on immigration.
The controversy erupted when at least 14 right-wing accounts reported losing access to premium features on X, including blue verification badges and monetization tools, according to CNBC.
What followed was a wave of criticism of Musk’s pro-immigration stance, particularly from anti-immigration factions within the MAGA movement.
Affected users, many of whom are affiliated with the ConservativeOG media group, said they were penalized after publicly expressing opposition to Musk’s position.
These accounts saw their reach on the platform significantly reduced, sparking accusations that Musk made invisible or censored those who disagreed with him.
Read the following article: ‘Zelle has become a gold mine for fraudsters’: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau takes legal action
Some of these individuals said they were concerned that losing their monetization features would impact their ability to continue posting content regularly.
In response to the growing controversy, Musk posted a “reminder” on X about the platform’s algorithm, stating that accounts frequently blocked or hidden by verified users would see their reach decrease.
This explanation, however, only fueled accusations of censorship. Critics felt that Musk, despite his claims to be a champion of free speech, was punishing those who voice opposition to his views on immigration.
The head of ConservativeOG, Preston Parrais among those who have been affected by this situation. He described Musk’s actions as a “political killing” aimed at silencing conservative voices.
Parra vowed to continue fighting Musk’s platform policies, which he sees as an attack on conservative values. The incident sparked a broader debate about the influence of tech executives like Musk and their role in shaping political discourse, particularly given his immigration background and ties to pro-government figures. immigration.
The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between supporters of free speech and those who believe social media platforms should regulate problematic content.
Read the following article:
