– Advertisement –
Israel’s decision to close its embassy in Dublin marks a further diplomatic escalation in strained relations with Ireland. This decision, announced on December 16, 2024, illustrates the seriousness of the differences between the two countries, particularly on the Palestinian question.
A reaction to accusations of genocide
According to Ashvasserthis closure comes after Ireland’s official participation in a complaint before the International Criminal Court (ICC). This complaint, filed by several countries, accuses Israel of “genocide” in Gaza, particularly in the context of recent armed conflicts. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar called the accusations “an anti-Semitic smear orchestrated to delegitimize the Jewish state.” He added that Ireland had crossed a red line by supporting what he called a “campaign of demonization” against Israel (Hamvaser, December 16, 2024).
A context of prolonged tensions
Israeli-Irish relations have always been marked by disagreements over the Palestinian question. According to HaderekhIreland is one of the European countries most critical of Israeli policies in the West Bank and Gaza. In 2023, Dublin unilaterally recognized a Palestinian state, a decision that exacerbated bilateral tensions. Since then, Ireland has increased its positions considered hostile by Jerusalem, in particular by calling for sanctions against Israel within the European Union (Haderekh, December 16, 2024).
Diplomatic repercussions
The closure of the Israeli embassy in Dublin is a strong signal sent by Israel. Merkaz Ha’inyanim reports that this decision is part of a broader review of Israeli diplomatic strategy. Gideon Sa’ar announced that diplomatic resources allocated to Ireland would be reallocated to countries considered more strategic for Israel, notably in Eastern Europe and Africa. The opening of a new embassy in Moldova was confirmed in this context (Merkaz Ha’inyanim, December 16, 2024).
Reactions in Ireland and Europe
The Irish Foreign Office expressed “regret” over the decision, saying Dublin remains committed to diplomatic dialogue with Israel. According to ShaharitIreland defended its position by saying its criticism of Israel was based on “the principles of international law and human rights.” However, this Irish position found limited resonance within the European Union, where several countries preferred to keep a more neutral position on the complaint before the ICC (Shaharit, December 16, 2024).
Divided public opinion
In Israel, the embassy closure was widely supported by right-wing parties, who see the move as an act of toughness in the face of growing hostility. However, critical voices, notably in the ranks of the opposition, have expressed reservations. Yated Neeman reports that opposition leader Yair Lapid called the move a “diplomatic setback,” arguing that Israel should “respond to criticism with engagement, not isolation.” In response, Gideon Sa’ar accused Lapid of “implicitly justifying Irish slander” (Yated Neeman, December 16, 2024).
An impact on the international scene
This affair takes place in a context of increased tensions between Israel and several international organizations. Ireland’s participation in the ICC complaint has reinforced Israel’s sense of international isolation, although allies, such as the United States, have expressed support for Jerusalem. According to Ashvasserthis Israeli decision could mark a turning point in its relations with the European Union, where Israel could seek to favor bilateral alliances with countries more favorable to its positions.
– Advertisement –
