The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
This is not the first time that the question of capital punishment for the most serious crimes has been raised in Peru. Since 1995, Parliament has rejected at least eight bills aimed at reinstating the ultimate sentence. Currently, perpetrators of rape of children under 14 face life imprisonment. According to official data, nearly 8,500 people are serving this type of sentence in Peruvian prisons.
A president under pressure
Dina Boluarte’s position comes at a time when her popularity is at its lowest. The president is the target of several investigations, in particular for not having informed the government or Parliament in 2023 of a nose operation that she was due to undergo. She is also implicated in the so-called “Rolexgate” affair, relating to luxury watches and jewelry that she allegedly did not declare. Judicial problems that weaken his leadership.
A divisive subject that raises many questions
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
This is not the first time that the question of capital punishment for the most serious crimes has been raised in Peru. Since 1995, Parliament has rejected at least eight bills aimed at reinstating the ultimate sentence. Currently, perpetrators of rape of children under 14 face life imprisonment. According to official data, nearly 8,500 people are serving this type of sentence in Peruvian prisons.
A president under pressure
Dina Boluarte’s position comes at a time when her popularity is at its lowest. The president is the target of several investigations, in particular for not having informed the government or Parliament in 2023 of a nose operation that she was due to undergo. She is also implicated in the so-called “Rolexgate” affair, relating to luxury watches and jewelry that she allegedly did not declare. Judicial problems that weaken his leadership.
A divisive subject that raises many questions
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
Belgium
This is not the first time that the question of capital punishment for the most serious crimes has been raised in Peru. Since 1995, Parliament has rejected at least eight bills aimed at reinstating the ultimate sentence. Currently, perpetrators of rape of children under 14 face life imprisonment. According to official data, nearly 8,500 people are serving this type of sentence in Peruvian prisons.
A president under pressure
Dina Boluarte’s position comes at a time when her popularity is at its lowest. The president is the target of several investigations, in particular for not having informed the government or Parliament in 2023 of a nose operation that she was due to undergo. She is also implicated in the so-called “Rolexgate” affair, relating to luxury watches and jewelry that she allegedly did not declare. Judicial problems that weaken his leadership.
A divisive subject that raises many questions
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
This is not the first time that the question of capital punishment for the most serious crimes has been raised in Peru. Since 1995, Parliament has rejected at least eight bills aimed at reinstating the ultimate sentence. Currently, perpetrators of rape of children under 14 face life imprisonment. According to official data, nearly 8,500 people are serving this type of sentence in Peruvian prisons.
A president under pressure
Dina Boluarte’s position comes at a time when her popularity is at its lowest. The president is the target of several investigations, in particular for not having informed the government or Parliament in 2023 of a nose operation that she was due to undergo. She is also implicated in the so-called “Rolexgate” affair, relating to luxury watches and jewelry that she allegedly did not declare. Judicial problems that weaken his leadership.
A divisive subject that raises many questions
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
Belgium
An abominable crime reignites the debate on the death penalty in Peru. The president calls for drastic measures, but the issue divides. Should we reinstate the ultimate sentence for child rapists?
An abominable crime shakes Peru and revives the debate on the death penalty. After the alleged rape and murder of a 12-year-old girl in a Lima slum, President Dina Boluarte has launched a shock call for the reinstatement of the death penalty for child rapists. A strong position that raises many questions.
An act of inconceivable gravity
It is a case that has deeply shocked Peruvian public opinion. The body of a 12-year-old girl was found on Sunday, wrapped in blankets under her alleged attacker’s bed. According to sources close to the investigation, the teenager had been reported missing two days earlier. A tragedy which aroused great emotion and anger in the country.
Faced with this heinous crime, conservative President Dina Boluarte did not mince her words. During a public ceremony on Tuesday, she said it was time to propose “drastic measures” in the face of acts “of such seriousness, which should be inconceivable in a society”. And added bluntly: “It is time to open the debate on the death penalty for child rapists.”
Capital punishment, abolished since 1979
As a reminder, the death penalty was abolished in Peru in 1979. Its reinstatement would therefore require a constitutional reform approved by Parliament. A perspective that goes against the country’s international commitments in the defense of human rights. But for President Boluarte, it is no longer a question of having “any type of indulgence towards those who dare to touch our children”.
We can’t allow guys like that to roam the streets freely.Dina Boluarte, President of Peru
A debate that is not new
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
This is not the first time that the question of capital punishment for the most serious crimes has been raised in Peru. Since 1995, Parliament has rejected at least eight bills aimed at reinstating the ultimate sentence. Currently, perpetrators of rape of children under 14 face life imprisonment. According to official data, nearly 8,500 people are serving this type of sentence in Peruvian prisons.
A president under pressure
Dina Boluarte’s position comes at a time when her popularity is at its lowest. The president is the target of several investigations, in particular for not having informed the government or Parliament in 2023 of a nose operation that she was due to undergo. She is also implicated in the so-called “Rolexgate” affair, relating to luxury watches and jewelry that she allegedly did not declare. Judicial problems that weaken his leadership.
A divisive subject that raises many questions
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
This is not the first time that the question of capital punishment for the most serious crimes has been raised in Peru. Since 1995, Parliament has rejected at least eight bills aimed at reinstating the ultimate sentence. Currently, perpetrators of rape of children under 14 face life imprisonment. According to official data, nearly 8,500 people are serving this type of sentence in Peruvian prisons.
A president under pressure
Dina Boluarte’s position comes at a time when her popularity is at its lowest. The president is the target of several investigations, in particular for not having informed the government or Parliament in 2023 of a nose operation that she was due to undergo. She is also implicated in the so-called “Rolexgate” affair, relating to luxury watches and jewelry that she allegedly did not declare. Judicial problems that weaken his leadership.
A divisive subject that raises many questions
The debate launched by the Peruvian president is far from unanimous. While some welcome its firmness in the face of abject crimes, others are concerned about an attack on fundamental rights and a civilizational step backwards. Is the death penalty really a deterrent? Does it not risk giving rise to irreparable judicial errors? Is it up to the state to decide who deserves to live or die? So many thorny questions that divide society.
One thing is certain: the emotion and anger aroused by the barbaric murder of this teenager must not obscure the need for a peaceful and rational debate. Because beyond this tragic news item, the whole question of Justice, human dignity and our values is raised. An immense challenge for Peru, and for all societies faced with extreme violence.
Belgium
