The text of the CGT of March 2017 is a partial reprint of this article from the UFC that Choisir qui itself takes up the words of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Linky meters – Dangerous or not? – News – UFC-Que Choisir.
So they are not at the origin of the thing, but it is indeed the World Health Organization through the IARC which has classified these waves as “may be” carcinogenic. Which is taken up by the CGT press release in the form of “possible carcinogen”. https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_F.pdf
30 seconds of research would have avoided the stupidity. But hey, I have the impression that we are dealing with a cultural trait there. If you find it a shame that Enedis is not filing a complaint, I for my part am delighted that they are royally ignoring your very ill-informed legal advice. They thus avoid spending the taxpayer's money (your other fad that you repeat ad nauseam, spreading yourself everywhere, as if paying a tax made you sole owner of the country ).
I wonder if the CGT could not sue you for defamation? If we consider that you attribute to them the dissemination of a false rumor and of being illegal and slanderous (even if it is quite funny to associate illegality and slander because in French law slander cannot make the subject to no prosecution, only slanderous denunciation is illegal File a complaint for slander: our advice – Deshoulières Avocats, but it is still a victory for the display of vague and evil knowledge mastered.)
Could we ask you, in the aim of better quality exchanges, to do at least some research before posting everywhere? Or at least have a tone that is a little less peremptory when you accuse people or organizations of imaginary offenses or crimes?
