Jury deliberates in Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York

Jury deliberates in Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York
Jury deliberates in Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York

The twelve jurors who have in their hands the legal fate of former US President Donald Trump concluded their first day of deliberations on Wednesday without finding a verdict. The former American president once again denounced a “scandalous situation”.

The Manhattan court judge, who is presiding over this trial with extraordinary stakes, in the middle of the presidential campaign, ordered the seven men and five women at the end of the morning to withdraw behind closed doors, after asking them to put their “opinions aside”. personal.”

In the afternoon, the jurors indicated that they wanted to hear again his instructions, a sort of legal manual for the case, as well as passages from certain testimony at the trial. The judge then told them that his readings would take place Thursday morning and released them from their obligations.

After six weeks of debates where sex, money and power were often discussed, the jury must answer the question of whether Donald Trump was guilty of 34 falsifications of accounting documents, intended to hide a payment of $130,000 to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to avoid a sex scandal at the very end of her 2016 presidential campaign.

“Mother Teresa”

The 77-year-old former president of the United States will have to return to Manhattan court on Thursday, the judge having prohibited him from leaving the court during all deliberations.

Campaigning for the November 5 presidential election, forced since mid-April to come to the courtroom every day, the Republican billionaire once again stormed to the press against “a scandalous situation” and denounced “lawsuits [pénales] “Even the Catholic saint “Mother Teresa could not brush aside these accusations,” he said, once the judge had given his instructions to the jurors.

Jurors entered the most crucial phase of the trial, after listening on Tuesday to the defense calling for a “quickly done, well done” acquittal, then to prosecutors calling for his conviction for having “subverted democracy.”

Unanimity of the jurors

In the event of a positive response, the 2024 presidential campaign would fall into an unprecedented scenario. Donald Trump could appeal and still appear on November 5 against Joe Biden, the 81-year-old outgoing Democratic president, but with the label of being convicted in court.

Jurors’ deliberations can take several days. They will have to be unanimous to declare Donald Trump guilty or not guilty.

During a five-hour indictment on Tuesday, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass tried one last time to convince the jurors that behind the accounting falsifications, “the heart of this affair is a conspiracy and a cover-up” to win the November 2016 presidential election. against Hillary Clinton, paying to hide information from voters.

The money was used to buy Stormy Daniels’ silence about a sexual relationship she claims to have had in 2006 with the billionaire, when he was already married to his wife Melania, an episode denied by Donald Trump. The sum was paid to the actress by Michael Cohen, the former confidant of the businessman and Republican leader.

“Conspiracy”

Once Donald Trump was in the White House, in 2017, Michael Cohen was reimbursed, using, according to the prosecution, false invoices and entries disguised as “legal fees” in the Trump accounts. Organization, hence the prosecution for accounting falsifications.

For the defense, this thesis does not hold. Donald Trump, now “leader of the free world” and busy with much more important problems, did not know the details of the paperwork when he paid his lawyer.

But for prosecutors, there was indeed a “plot” ahead of the campaign to chase away any threat of a sexual scandal, even if it meant taking out the checkbook to silence witnesses. The accusation is based on a meeting which allegedly took place in August 2015 between Donald Trump, Michael Cohen and the boss of an American tabloid, David Pecker.

On Wednesday, jurors asked to rehear passages of David Pecker’s testimony.


ats, afp

-

-

PREV Val-d’Oise: a man injured in the fire of his house
NEXT at what time and on which channel to watch the fight?