First day of deliberations in historic Trump trial: verdict postponed

First day of deliberations in historic Trump trial: verdict postponed
First day of deliberations in historic Trump trial: verdict postponed

The 12 jurors who have in their hands the legal fate of Donald Trump concluded their first day of deliberations on Wednesday May 29, 2024 without finding a verdict in the first criminal trial in the history of a former president of the United States who aspires to become again.

Manhattan court judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over this trial with extraordinary stakes, in the middle of the presidential campaign, ordered the seven men and five women at the end of the morning to withdraw behind closed doors, after asking them to put their side aside. “personal opinions”.

“You have an obligation to put aside (your) personal opinions whether they are favorable or against the accused”he solemnly warned while reading his instructions to these 12 citizens of New York.

In the afternoon, the jurors indicated that they wanted to hear again his instructions, a sort of legal manual for the case, as well as passages from certain testimony at the trial. The judge then told them that his readings would take place Thursday morning and released them from their obligations.

After six weeks of debates where it was often a question of sex, money and power, the jury finds itself faced with a single question: was Donald Trump guilty of 34 falsifications of accounting documents, intended to hide a $130,000 payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels to avoid a sex scandal at the very end of her 2016 presidential campaign?

The former president of the United States will have to return to court in Manhattan on Thursday, the judge having prohibited him from leaving the court during all deliberations.

“Mother Teresa”

Campaigning for the November 5 presidential election, forced since mid-April to come to the courtroom every day, the Republican billionaire once again stormed to the press against “a scandalous situation” and denounced “rigged (criminal) prosecutions”.

Even the Catholic saint “Mother Teresa could not brush aside these accusations”he said, once the judge gave his instructions to the jurors.

Jurors entered the most crucial phase of the trial, after listening Tuesday to the defense requesting an acquittal ” quickly done well done “then prosecutors calling for his conviction for having “subverted democracy”.

In the event of a positive response, the 2024 presidential campaign would fall into an unprecedented scenario.

Donald Trump could appeal and still appear on November 5 against Joe Biden, the 81-year-old outgoing Democratic president, but with the label of being convicted in court.

Jurors’ deliberations can take several days. They will have to be unanimous to declare Donald Trump guilty or not guilty.

“Conspiracy”

During a five-hour indictment Tuesday, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass tried one last time to convince jurors that behind the accounting falsifications, “the heart of this matter is a conspiracy and a cover-up” to win the November 2016 presidential election against Hillary Clinton, by paying to hide information from voters.

The money was used to buy Stormy Daniels’ silence about a sexual relationship she claims to have had in 2006 with the billionaire, when he was already married to his wife Melania, an episode denied by Donald Trump.

The sum was paid to the actress by Michael Cohen, the former confidant of the businessman and Republican leader.

Once Donald Trump was in the White House in 2017, Michael Cohen was reimbursed, using, according to the prosecution, false invoices and entries disguised as “legal costs” in the accounts of the Trump Organization, hence the prosecution for accounting falsifications.

For the defense, this thesis does not hold. Donald Trump, who became “leader of the free world” and busy with much more important issues, didn’t know the details of the paperwork when he paid his lawyer.

But for the prosecutors, there was indeed a “conspiracy” ahead of the campaign to chase away any threat of sexual scandal, even if it means taking out the checkbook to silence witnesses. The accusation is based on a meeting which allegedly took place in August 2015 between Donald Trump, Michael Cohen and the boss of an American tabloid, David Pecker.

On Wednesday, jurors asked to rehear passages of David Pecker’s testimony.

-

-

PREV the good news of the week!
NEXT at what time and on which channel to watch the fight?