Moroccan Sahara: the serious slippages of Aziz Ghali, president of AMDH

The president of the Moroccan Association for Human Rights (AMDH), Aziz Ghali, has spouted numerous untruths concerning political subjects and human rights.

He even took tendentious positions vis-à-vis the first national cause, which unifies politicians, unions, civil society actors and all the living forces of the nation, relays Al Ahdath Al Maghribia this Monday, December 16.

Positions which reveal its shortcomings in human rights action, which is based on verification and demonstration, and not on accusations and provocation of the patriotic spirit of Moroccans.

The man named Aziz Ghali fell into these traps by trying to develop fallacious arguments in cases on which the courts have already ruled.

He thus defended the criminals involved in the Gdim Izik affair, who killed 11 members of the police.

He even pushed his effrontery to the point of aligning himself, in the name of the AMDH, with the thesis of the separatists, by supporting their rejection of the Moroccan autonomy initiative, which is nevertheless considered by most countries as the solution to put an end to this artificial conflict.

The lawyer and human rights defender Naoufal Bouamri commented on the positions and tendentious remarks of Aziz Ghali, indicating that “the president of the AMDH presented “erroneous data on the Gdim Izik affair, masking these dramatic events with false arguments on human rights, without ever taking the slightest position on attacks on the right to life of which 11 members of the security forces were victims, who had intervened peacefully to dismantle this camp, but were murdered in a sordid and Daechist manner».

The lawyer questioned himself in these terms: “Does killing, urinating on a corpse and mutilating it constitute the defense of human rights?».

Regarding the Moroccan Sahara, Naoufal Bouamri indicated that Aziz Ghali had expressed a political position while covering it with arguments inspired by human rights: “it would have been bolder to state that this is a political position. In this case, we would have understood him, and considered his words as an opinion, even if we do not agree with him. He also made fallacious arguments when he said that the UN did not have details on the autonomy plan for the Moroccan Sahara, because there is no report from the UN Secretary General. , nor of the Security Council, which raises this subject“, he concluded.