“You’re going to pay for it”: the vice-president of the Assembly accuses Manuel Bompard of having threatened her: News

“You’re going to pay for it”: the vice-president of the Assembly accuses Manuel Bompard of having threatened her: News
“You’re going to pay for it”: the vice-president of the Assembly accuses Manuel Bompard of having threatened her: News

Naïma Moutchou, Horizons deputy and vice-president of the National Assembly, denounced on X threats made against her by Manuel Bompard, Thursday November 28, within the hemicycle. The coordinator of La insoumise responded to him.

New electric day at the National Assembly. Thursday, November 28, discussions between elected officials were tense to the point of leading to several points of order and session suspensions. A fight was even narrowly avoided between two parliamentarians. For her part, Naïma Moutchou, Horizons MP and vice-president of the hemicycle, accused Manuel Bompard, the coordinator of La France insoumise, of having threatened her. In a statement published on the social network X (formerly Twitter), she claimed to have been “for the first time” since she was elected “the target of direct threats from another MP”.

“During a session suspension, Manuel Bompard threw the following in my face several times: 'You are going to pay for it, you are going to pay for what you are doing, you are complicit yes , you will pay that yes yes, including electorally'”denounced the member for Val-d’Oise. “A red line has been crossed, which reflects the worrying drift of our parliamentary debates since LFI adopted the strategy of disorder and chaos”she also wrote in her press release.

Manuel Bompard denounces a “false attack”

Friday, Manuel Bompard “confirms having indicated to Naïma Moutchou during a session suspension that she would have to take electoral responsibility for her participation in the organized blockage of the repeal of retirement at 64”he declared on X in response to the Vice-President of the Assembly. “None of us has ever proposed to resolve political differences other than through voting”he defended himself, denouncing a “false attack” on the part of Naïma Moutchou, whom he criticizes in particular for having demonstrated “partiality” in the organization of debates within the hemicycle.

published on November 29 at 4:15 p.m., Cédric Alexis, 6Medias

Share

France

-

-

PREV How to avoid eye infections – and what to do if you get one
NEXT How ‘Senna’ TV show deepens relationship between Netflix, F1