The death, which occurred after several days of coma in France, led, according to Dakar Actu, to the drafting of a certificate of the type of death by a French doctor, concluding that it was a natural cause.
However, the autopsy commissioned in Senegal revealed evidence suggesting the death may not have been natural, paving the way for a judicial investigation.
Shortly after the death of Mamadou Moustapha Ba, a French doctor issued a type of death certificate confirming a natural death.
And, according to the revelations of our colleagues from the aforementioned site, this document was decisive in allowing the repatriation of the remains to Senegal.
However, as soon as the body arrived in Dakar, the Senegalese authorities ordered an autopsy.
This decision follows “elements” revealed by the Senegalese investigation, which justified, according to the Dakar Prosecutor, additional checks to establish the causes of death.
The results of this autopsy, made public by the Prosecutor’s Office, contradict the first French conclusions.
Indeed, the Senegalese expertise highlights elements “incompatible with a natural death”, thus raising suspicions as to the circumstances of the death.
This divergence between the conclusions of French and Senegalese doctors has fueled a lively controversy, relaunching debates around the transparency and impartiality of procedures.
The relatives of the deceased find themselves in a state of incomprehension, torn between the certainties of the French authorities and the in-depth investigations of the Senegalese authorities.
On the Senegalese side, the suspension of the formalities for lifting the body and burial indicates the desire to carry out more in-depth investigations to dispel any doubt.
For some observers, this decision reflects caution in the face of the gray areas surrounding the death of Mamadou Moustapha Ba, while others believe that it reflects distrust of foreign medical authorities.
This complex situation raises several crucial questions. Who, French or Senegalese forensic doctors, has the truth? Could the divergence in medical opinions be explained by different methods or criteria of analysis between the two countries?
The situation also invites questions about the political and diplomatic implications of such an affair.
Citizens, for their part, expect clear and transparent answers, as the affair gains momentum on the public stage.
If the Senegalese investigation were to confirm the theory of an unnatural death, this would open the way to prosecutions to establish possible responsibilities.
In the absence of definitive conclusions, the case remains unresolved, fueling speculation and questions.
The Dakar prosecutor’s office, by communicating regularly, seems determined to guarantee the transparency of the process, while the family and public opinion hope that the truth will be established in a clear and indisputable manner.
This sensitive case is a reminder of the importance of cooperation and trust between international judicial and medical authorities, in order to preserve the integrity of investigations and provide justice to the victims’ families.
BKD…
