((Automated translation by Reuters, please see disclaimer https://bit.ly/rtrsauto))
(Added comments from Epic and Google in paragraphs 4 and 5) by Mike Scarcella
Google, the Alphabet company
GOOGL.O , asked a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to overturn a jury’s verdict and a judge’s order requiring it to revamp its Play app store.
In its first detailed oral argument before the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Google said the trial judge made legal errors that unfairly benefited the plaintiff, Epic Games, the maker of “Fortnite.” .
Demanding a “radical overhaul” of Google Play and its Android mobile device operating system will harm app developers and consumers, Google said in its lawsuit.
Epic said in a statement Wednesday that Google relied on “flawed arguments” that the jury rejected. “This baseless appeal is a desperate attempt by Google to avoid complying with the jury’s unanimous decision,” Epic said.
Google declined to comment beyond its court filing.
Epic’s 2020 lawsuit accused Google of monopolizing how consumers access apps on Android devices and how they pay for transactions within apps. The Cary, North Carolina-based company persuaded a San Francisco jury last year that Google had illegally stifled competition.
Based on the jury’s findings, U.S. District Judge James Donato ordered Google in October to allow users to download competing app stores into Play and make Play’s app catalog available to those users. competitors, among other reforms.
The order, which would bind Google for three years, is on hold pending review by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Google told the appeals court on Wednesday that Epic’s lawsuit should never have been heard by a jury because it sought to enjoin Google’s behavior, not seek damages. . Google said Mr. Donato unfairly allowed Epic to tell jurors that Google and Apple
AAPL.O were not competitors in app distribution and in-app payments.
The complaint says Mr. Donato was wrong to issue an injunction affecting users and developers nationwide, not just Epic. Google said the order made Mr. Donato “a central planner responsible for the design of the product”
The 9th Circuit said it would hear oral arguments on Feb. 3, and a decision would be issued later in the year.
Related News :