IN BRIEF |
|
Building materials such as concrete and plastics could well be at the center of a green revolution, playing a crucial role in reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. A groundbreaking study, led by civil engineers and earth systems experts from the Universities of California (UC Davis) and Stanford, found that these materials have the potential to trap billions of tons of CO2. Recently published in the journal Sciencethis research demonstrates how the strategic use of building materials, combined with other measures to decarbonize our economy, could significantly contribute to achieving global climate goals. With more than 30 billion tonnes of building materials manufactured worldwide each year, the potential impact is considerable. But how can these materials, used daily, make a difference in the fight against climate change?
Everyday materials to trap carbon
Carbon sequestration is an important process that involves capturing CO2, whether it comes directly from human activities or is extracted from the atmosphere, and then transforms it into a stable, isolated form. Traditionally, solutions such as underground injection or ocean storage have been proposed. However, these methods are often complex and carry significant environmental risks. It is in this context that a fundamental question arises: Why not use materials we already mass produce to store this carbon?
Elisabeth Van Roijen, lead author of the study, wonders about this possibility. With colleagues Sabbie Miller and Steve Davis, she assessed the carbon storage potential in common building materials such as concrete, asphalt, plastics, wood and bricks. These materials, produced at 30 billion tonnes each year, could revolutionize our approach to carbon storage. By integrating carbon into these materials, not only do we reduce emissions, but we also transform our infrastructures into real carbon sinks.
This approach, although simple in theory, still requires research to be implemented on a large scale. But it paves the way for innovations that could well redefine our relationship with construction materials. The potential of these everyday elements to contribute to the fight against global warming is immense and deserves to be explored carefully.
Egyptian pyramids: this revolutionary discovery could finally solve their mystery
Concrete: a major lever
Among all the materials studied, concrete stands out for its exceptional potential. As the most widely used construction material in the world, with more than 20 billion tonnes produced each year, concrete is a strategic resource in the fight against climate change. Researchers have explored several innovative techniques to enhance its ability to store carbon.
One of the promising methods consists of integrating biochar, derived from heated biomass, into concrete. This process captures and stores CO2 while reinforcing the structure of the concrete. Another technique involves the use of artificial carbon-laden aggregates for paving, which could transform urban areas into vast carbon reservoirs. The replacement of asphalt binders and fossil plastics with bio-sourced alternatives also represents a way forward for reducing the carbon footprint of the construction sector.
The results of the study are unequivocal: if just 10% of global production of aggregates for concrete became capable of storing CO2, this would capture a gigatonne of carbon dioxide each year. This perspective radically changes our view of concrete, transforming it from a simple construction material to a key part of the global climate strategy. It is therefore crucial to continue research and promote the adoption of these new technologies to take full advantage of this potential.
Technologies awaiting adoption
Although some of the technologies discussed are ready for use, others still require research to validate their performance and net impact on carbon storage. Bio-sourced plastics, for example, have a particularly high carbon capture potential per unit of weight. However, their large-scale implementation remains limited by technical and economic challenges.
Red alert: CO2 reaches unprecedented levels, what to do? Answers here
The raw materials needed for these new approaches mainly come from low value-added waste, such as biomass. Their valorization could not only stimulate the economy, but also promote a circular model in the construction sector. This model encourages the reuse and transformation of existing resources, thereby reducing dependence on fossil raw materials.
However, it is essential to verify the performance of materials and to ensure that manufacturing methods do not cancel out the expected environmental benefits. Continued research in this area is crucial to overcoming these obstacles and realizing the potential of these technologies. The question remains: how can we accelerate the adoption of these innovations so that they become standard parts of our construction practices?
An opportunity for decarbonization
Researchers develop carbon-negative concrete: they infused regular cement with environmentally friendly biochar that was able to suck up to 23% of its weight in carbon dioxide from the air
-
byu/giuliomagnifico inscience
According to Sabbie Miller, these technologies represent an immediate opportunity to reduce CO2 emissions. Many of these approaches are just waiting to be adopted to transform the construction sector into a powerful ally in the fight against climate change. Carbon integration in buildings could not only reduce the sector’s carbon footprint, but also have positive economic impacts.
Elisabeth Van Roijen, currently a researcher at the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, emphasizes the urgency of these solutions. The potential is considerable, and the adoption of these innovative materials could also bring significant economic and environmental benefits. By transforming buildings into carbon sinks, we have the opportunity to create sustainable infrastructure that actively contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
This 17m-diameter Chinese underwater tunnel shatters world records in just 110 days of excavation
This approach not only offers environmental benefits, but it also represents an opportunity for economic and technological development. By leveraging these innovations, we can redefine the role of the construction sector in the ecological transition and take a decisive step towards a more sustainable future.
Buildings at the heart of the ecological transition
As the global race to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensifies, integrating carbon storage into building materials represents a promising avenue. By leveraging solutions already in development, this strategy could not only reduce pollution, but also transform a key sector into a central player in the ecological transition.
By investing in research and innovation, we can accelerate the adoption of these technologies and maximize their impact on our environment. The buildings of tomorrow could become valuable allies in our fight against global warming, contributing to a greener and more resilient economy.
For this vision to become a reality, it is essential to promote public policies favoring the adoption of these materials and to encourage partnerships between the private sector, researchers and governments. Together, these actors can play a key role in transforming our built environment and achieving global climate goals.
The adoption of building materials capable of storing carbon offers an innovative and promising solution to reduce CO2 emissions globally. By transforming our buildings into carbon sinks, we can not only reduce pollution, but also promote a circular and sustainable economy. Technical and economic challenges remain, but with continued research and supportive policies, these obstacles can be overcome.
The transition to greener building materials is a unique opportunity to rethink our approach to urbanization and infrastructure. How will these innovations transform our urban landscape and our ways of life in the future? The answer to this question could well define the next era of sustainable construction.
Challenge this quiz: are you knowledgeable about this article?
Did you like it? 4.6/5 (23)