It was a particularly weak Manchester City who lost 2-1 against Aston Villa, with almost no chances. The Belgians barely entered the match, if at all. Kevin De Bruyne remained on the bench, Jérémy Doku only played from minute 83. There were many criticisms on this subject.
De Bruyne remains on the bench
De Bruyne was on the bench and stayed there. He briefly joined Pep Guardiola after the warm-up, but remained on the bench. On X’s side, we ask ourselves questions. Filip Joos has spoken of a possible dispute, but this is pure conjecture. But is it so illogical that De Bruyne is on the bench?
The 33-year-old Red Devil has been sidelined for many months and Man City probably don't want to lose him again. The number of injuries is already high and KDB's body has become very fragile in recent years.
Rest or tactical choice?
Additionally, De Bruyne has played four matches since December 4. It would therefore not be surprising if Guardiola kept him on the sidelines for a while to spare him for a week. After all, two more matches are scheduled over the next eight days…
Even if KDB will probably not be happy to have had to start on the bench. It must be said that KDB has not regained his level since his injury either. Will he play again in five days?
