Martin St-Louis let his frustration burst out in a scathing manner when, at a press conference, journalist Luc Gélinas dared to address the rumors concerning a possible meeting between him, Kent Hughes and Gerard Gallant in a Toronto café.
“Martin, Monday after the match, we didn’t talk about it, but there was a big buzz in Montreal. So, you were perhaps looking for an experienced assistant. Obviously, you don’t have one need it, but is it something you’ve already thought about and might be interested in one day?”
Visibly annoyed, St-Louis brushed the question aside, rejecting any insinuation of a possible collaboration with an experienced coach like Gallant.
“It’s rumours, Kent addressed it, it’s the deal, it’s just rumours”he said, his face closed, with no room for deeper discussion.
The arrogant attitude of St-Louis, who suddenly seemed to establish himself as the all-powerful god of the organization, left its mark.
When Gélinas tried to ask him if the Canadiens coach was considering the possibility of adding an experienced coach to his staff, he replied coldly, “I think of everything,” as if this question were a personal offense.
“I think about everything, but you know, it’s rumors. Rumors, but that’s part of the deal.” he said with fire in his eyes, as if he wanted to strike down Gélinas with his gaze.
The coach’s reaction, between his famous assumed arrogance and a certain exasperation, contrasted sharply with his moment of vulnerability last Monday, when he almost shed tears while talking about his doubts during the recent series of defeats.
At that moment, we discovered a sincere St. Louis, seeming fragile and honest. But here, it was a completely different character who stood before the journalists: a man “stuck” in his positions, refusing to show the slightest openness to the idea of external help.
This haughty attitude has left journalists in the lurch, and fans of the Montreal Canadiens are starting to ask questions.
After all, a struggling coach could benefit from the experience of an assistant like Gallant. But St. Louis, clearly self-loving about his independence and control, continues to reject any suggestion of help.
This mixture of susceptibility and denial of reality is frightening: Martin St-Louis, in his position as an untouchable coach, gives the impression that he refuses to recognize his limits and the development needs of his team.
The prospect of seeing Gallant join the Canadiens staff was initially greeted with enthusiasm and excitement by the CH team.
Georges Laraque continues to affirm that he believes his source, even if the CH continues to deny. Regardless, Gallant’s idea in Montreal to help St-Louis was approved by all of Quebec.
Known for his success as a head coach in the NHL, Gallant could have been a major reinforcement for a team in the midst of a rebuild.
But St. Louis is still staunchly opposed to sharing the reins with another authority figure, a sign of his need to control every aspect of the team.
A sign of his inferiority complex.
This isn’t the first time St. Louis’ arrogance and temper have come to the surface. After a difficult start to the season and moments of doubt where he confided his fears of never winning another game in the NHL, he moved from a position of vulnerability to that of an inflexible leader closed to criticism.
It’s clear he feels threatened by the idea of Gallant, a respected coach, at his side.
For now, Kent Hughes seems to respect his coach’s position, but the team’s results will certainly have an impact on what happens next.
If the Canadiens continue to stagnate, the pressure could force Hughes to seriously consider adding an experienced assistant – with or without St. Louis’ approval.
And the coach knows it. That’s why he’s so tense.
Martin St-Louis’ press conference took on a frosty tone after the question concerning the rumors of his meeting with Gerard Gallant and Kent Hughes.
This moment marked a turning point in his speech. St. Louis, usually more open to questions, showed a closed and even aggressive face, making the atmosphere tense for the rest of the conference.
No matter the subject discussed, whether it was the management of his players or the evolution of his strategies, the coach remained on the defensive, as if he was about to lose patience.
His exchange on the separation of Suzuki and Caufield, usually the occasion for more nuanced discussions, was cold and distant, not to mention confused.
“I think they need time to get away from each other. It’s not that they don’t love each other, but sometimes, moving away allows them to get together better. I experienced it as a player, and it’s normal to have these periods. »
He also lost patience when talking about criticism of Caufield’s play, blaming the fact that his forward wasn’t capable of playing with anyone other than Nick Suzuki.
“Is Cole the type of guy who can play with someone else? I don’t know yet. It’s a question of adjustment.
“For me, it is essential to give each player the means to fully develop, even if it means changes like this.”
And he was on the verge of getting angry when talking about criticism of Cole Caufield’s defensive play.
“His appearance without the puck is much better. It will continue to evolve. It’s something we talk about a lot.
I’m trying to get through this internship. The world questioned his production on the goal side. I have always said, Caufield will always score goals.
It’s not something I’m going to teach him, but I’m going to help him learn to play the complete game. Then that’s what we do. »
As for his vision for Kirby Dach’s future, he responded with a nonchalance that betrayed his irritation:
” I don’t know. No ? I don’t know. »
“For me, it’s just playing the game, taking more reps. I feel like he’s starting to feel more like he can be and not have to worry about winning face-offs from a center.
The center’s responsibilities are defensive. I think it gives him a little more time to find his game on the wing. »
This behavior suggests a deep unease, amplified by the criticism and the increasing pressure on his shoulders.
After the recent defeats and the media storm surrounding his choices, St-Louis seems on edge, going from a moment of vulnerability – where he expressed his doubts about his ability to win games in the NHL – to a posture of defensive arrogance.
The transformation in his attitude reflects enormous tension that could soon impact his effectiveness in managing the team.
The image projected by this press conference shows St. Louis on the edge of the abyss.
Rather than strengthening his position in people’s minds, his rigidity and refusal to discuss the future of the team with an experienced assistant left an impression of immaturity and public isolation.
This behavior only adds fuel to the fire of criticism. Martin St-Louis is collapsing with his ego and his pride.
We see an immature man, self-conscious and incapable of realizing his own weaknesses.
Man’s greatest enemy is his ego. And St. Louis is the best example.
