Guilty or innocent? It is one of the dichotomies that most excites public opinion. Factions form, and supporters of a thought line up. Modernity demands certainty, it wants the truth. But it escapes clarity. And then it proceeds along the path indicated by the dictates of Reason of State. Sinner is about to enter the field. But the question regarding his positivity and the outcome of the subsequent investigation is being discussed, in a Manichean way. There are those who have defended him strenuously and have not raised any doubts. There are those who have attacked him and have spoken of institutions that are complacent towards him. And the greats? They have taken a position somewhere between cold and sibylline. Alcaraz expressed himself philosophically: “I believe in clean sport”. Djokovic spoke as a trade unionist: “There is a lack of consistency, there must be the possibility that everyone has been treated the same. We see the absence of standardized protocols”. The Italian let off steam. Interviewed by ESPN, he is now sure: “Now I know who is my friend and who is not.”. He states: “I was treated like everyone else”. He strongly supports his theses, and admits: “I understand that the position I am in has allowed me to have the best lawyers, a great legal team.”. Meanwhile, the scapegoat has been found, and his physiotherapist Giacomo Naldi is no longer part of his staff. The matter is legally concluded, the rest is a consequence that belongs to the specious debate, the argument and the analysis are of no interest. And the alibis and the reasons are confused, as always.
(Foto Keystone)
Related News :