2. “Bodart reassured his defense.”
“For his return to the eleven, from the first minutes, Bodart was over-concentrated. The first ball he touched was the result of anticipating a through ball. This outing was explosive and gave him confidence until the end He made a decisive double save on this corner Moreover, the presence of Bodart was decisive for the defense of all the stopped phases of the Circle (they were also very well given). who made the job too. His partners went up to him at the end, seeming to say they were happy he was back.”
Arnaud Bodart played again for Standard: “I will always be there for the club that I love”
3. “Start a kid for the right reasons.”
“What about Epolo now? He could play in Nationale 1, yes. Given his age and for his development, it would be normal. But will that be enough? At the end of the day, the choice to opt for Epolo during this first part of the season, was it made ‘for’ Epolo or ‘against’ Bodart? When you field a young man, you should not do it for the wrong reasons but because you assume and believe in your project? Genk was able to do it with Vandevoordt and other young outfield players, from the start, the premise was not the right one and who is paying the costs today. Be careful, I don’t want any of it. case me to be disdainful towards him The fact remains that he has exposed himself in a negative way in recent weeks Not everyone can be Courtois, who remains an exception, without even talking about talent, before launching a young person. a guard who is forced to make choices all the time), you have to ask yourself if he is ready or not The official version of the Standard will be to say that they are protecting a young person. The unofficial version is mainly that they noticed that they were not far from the top 6 and… playdowns and that they wanted to change the dynamic. This is where all the hypocrisy of football lies….”
Arnaud Bodart is ready to move on to Standard: “I’m ready if the coach needs me against Charleroi”
4. “Camara has physical, tactical potential…”
“After the break, Leko’s approach, in terms of animation with his two attackers, was better. In the first half, Zeqiri and Eckert were rather next to each other. Which was problematic because Leko’s idea was to attack the back of the Cercle block, not to play inside, which was precisely what happened, because the two attackers did not do what Leko asked. possibility of playing long in the second half, the coach put Eckert back under Zeqiri: when one deviated, the other attacked the spaces. I appreciated the performance of Camara too, who gave the assist. goal. He has great speed and physical, tactical potential… I was very surprised that other clubs were not interested in the profile of the former RWDM player.”
