After 5 years, Joker 2 finally settles a debate that completely changes the original ending!
Tl;dr
- Joker: Folie à Deux failed to replicate the success of the first Joker.
- The film received negative reviews from viewers and critics.
- The film reveals that the Joker did not kill the psychiatrist at the end of the first installment.
A sequel that disappoints
The movie Joker: Folie à Deuxdespite expectations, failed to reproduce the phenomenal success of the first Joker. The film suffered overwhelming reviews in its opening weekend, putting it in a difficult position to turn a profit, let alone compete with the record numbers of the first Joker.
A mixed reception from critics
Several factors affected the performance of Joker: Folie à Deux. The film was not well received by critics and audiences. It currently holds the worst rating CinemaScore among all superhero movie adaptations, with a D. This shows how viewers react negatively to the film. Moreover, Joker: Folie à Deux took a different direction from the first film, making crucial changes to the character of Arthur Fleck, played by Joaquin Phoenix.
Surprising revelations
In the first film, Arthur Fleck’s character, who will become the Joker, kills six people. However, the end of Joker leaves doubt surrounding a possible seventh victim, a psychiatrist. However, Joker: Folie à Deux subtly reveals that Arthur did not kill the psychiatrist. This revelation completely changes the perspective on the ending of the first film.
What do we think?
The disappointment caused by Joker: Folie à Deux illustrates the importance of public expectation and criticism. Bold choices can sometimes be beneficial, but they also carry risks. However, the revelation regarding the fate of the psychiatrist in the film adds a new dimension to the interpretation of the Joker’s character and opens new perspectives for future films in the franchise.
Related News :