Limitation of unemployment: “We refer the charges to the municipalities and the regions, it is a robbery, it is a hold-up of Brussels”

Ahmed Laaouej, president of the Brussels PS, was invited to Bonjour Brussels.
Can the Arizona agreement be positive for Brussels? “” “We especially see the attack towards the Brussels residents and all the Belgians“, Consives Ahmed Laaouej.
“They explained to us that they were going to increase by € 500 per month. We can see that it is pipeau. What I see above all is a dismantling of the standard of living of the Belgians. ” For the president of the Brussels PS, Arizona will just impoverish the beneficiaries, and not put the workers in a better situation. “” “It is not on a social desert that economic prosperity is created.”
■ Ahmed Laaouejpresident of the Brussels PS, at the microphone of Fabrice Grosfilley
Ahmed Laaouej believes that Vooruit makes a mistake by going to the Arizona government.
Unemployment benefits will be limited over time. Some beneficiaries will turn to the CPAS. There is therefore a risk for the municipalities. “” “The N-VA succeeds in its bet, its political project: suffocating the Brussels Region.” “They announce a return effect of more than 30%: it’s pipeau.”
He believes that Bart de Wever is “The big winner” : “There is no longer any need to reform or regionalize social security. We refer the charges to the municipalities and the regions. It is a robbery, it is a heist in Brussels, with the complicity of the MR and the committed“.
Fusion of police areas: “There is always the conflict of interest procedure”
The federal government agreement provides the merger of Brussels police areas. “Lthe procedures provide that the municipalities must be consulted at a time. The Brussels Parliament also has a say. And there is always the conflict of interest procedure. I hope we can, when the time comes, count on the committed and some MR who are against this reform. Which would freeze the adoption of the text at the federal level“, Says Ahmed Laaouej, who repeats his veto against the N-VA, qUand we see the damage that this party imposes on the federal level.”
This procedure for conflict of interest is provided for a legislative assembly (here: the Brussels Parliament) which considers itself seriously injured by a project or a bill of another assembly can suspend the legislative procedure. She finds herself frozen for 60 days, for an attempted consultation between the two assemblies. In the event of failure, the Senate and the Concertation Committee enter the dance. All this supposes, however, that there is at least already a text deposited in the Chamber, which carries this reform decried.