The saga of the “Lockdown Party of Waterloo” in court: work penalties required against the father and the mother

The saga of the “Lockdown Party of Waterloo” in court: work penalties required against the father and the mother


The Walloon Brabant Criminal Court on Tuesday examined the “Lock-Down Party” file on Waterloo on Tuesday. Believing that the police made a legal and proportionate use of the force on the night of December 18 to 19, 2020, the public prosecutor requested the acquittal of agents. Work penalties have been required against the father and mother, prosecuted for rebellion and volunteer to the police.

Waterloo’s Lockdown Party file once again handed over … to February for lack of staff at the registry

The case had made noise in the second wave of the covid: young people had gathered in a habitation of Waterloo and the police intervention had gone wrong. The mother, Valérie G., who filmed the speakers, had violently slapped a policewoman. She had to be mastered, and her husband also had to be put on the ground. Everything had been filmed by participants in the evening, and video montages had circulated on social networks and had been sent to the press.

“Kicker Party” in full covid in Waterloo: for the prosecution, the muscular intervention of the police was proportionate

At the hearing on Tuesday, Jérôme S., the father, spoke of “cavalry” and “pack” by evoking the intervention of the police, conceding that his family has character, but that she is honest . Pursued, the family launched a direct quote against a good part of the police, believing that they had used violence in a non -legitimate manner.

Lockdown Party in Waterloo who degenerated: “Shadious reactions from the family who, in addition, plays the martyrs”, according to a police lawyer

The public prosecutor, like the civil parties, asked court on Tuesday the acquittal of the police. For the king’s prosecutor, it is time for the judicial truth to intervene in this case: the police intervened in a legal manner and used the force in a proportionate manner.

Deploring the lack of questioning of defendants, he requested a 120 -hour work penalty against Valérie G., and 80 hours against her husband. Defense will argue on February 18.

Related Articles