He brushes the vagina of a mental deficient woman in a center in La Louvière, with cream for the feet

Régine claims to have been raped in closed doors. She said Robert had closed the door behind him, so that he could abuse her. According to the prosecution, he caressed her breasts and sex. Then he brushed his vagina with a cream, which was actually a cream for the feet. Sexual relations were painful, to the point that Régine still had a stomach ache twenty-four hours later. Régine declares that she pretended to be a desire to go to the toilet to escape her executioner.
Sous administration
On Monday, in court, Robert said that it was Régine who had locked him in his room, not the opposite, and that he had undressed it, when he did not want to put himself naked before She. They had several sexual intercourse on August 8 and 9. He admits it. “”She was happy“, He repeats before his three judges.
An investigation was carried out in the reception center for disabled people, where the complainant had arrived recently, to get closer to her dad who lives in the region. Robert, meanwhile, has been taken care of for more than forty years by this kind of institution. He is even under administration of goods and people since a judgment pronounced in 2023 by the justice of the Peace of the Louvière. Formerly a worker in a protected workshop, he now lives in a retirement home.
She drives the fire in her house in Saint-Vaast: the court grants her extenuating circumstances
Régine has been the subject of credibility expertise. The expert has made a positive report. As for Robert, it was described as a heavy flirt with the employees. According to the psychiatrist, he is not suffering from any mental disorder and therefore responsible for his actions. The prosecution fears a risk of recurrence and requires an 18 -month prison sentence, accompanied by a probationary stay.
Misunderstanding
Me Berger, lawyer for Robert, pleads his acquittal, questioning the two reports of psychiatric expertise. According to him, Robert confuses the terms “content” et “consenting“. It is precisely the legal version of the word consent which is at the heart of the legal debate.”Could he understand that she was not consenting?“Asks the lawyer. He doubts. The moral element of the offense is called into question.
The court will decide the question in a judgment which will be pronounced on February 24.