In 2021, the National Council of the Order of Physicians appealed the simple reprimand inflicted on the controversial professor for having promoted hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for Covid-19. “We wonder if it’s Salvador Dali who directs it,” replies the scientist.
For having violated the Code of Medical Ethics by promoting hydroxychloroquine against Covid-19, despite the absence of proven effect, Didier Raoult is prohibited from practicing medicine for two years from February 1, 2025, according to the decision on appeal from the national disciplinary chamber, according to information from the Parisian confirmed at Figaro by the National Order of Physicians.
The national disciplinary chamber of the order of doctors effectively ruled in a decision dated October 2 and that Le Figaro was able to consult that “Professor Raoult did not base his public positions on confirmed data, did not exercise caution and promoted an insufficiently proven treatment”. But, as in the first instance, she considered that Didier Raoult did not make his patients run “an unjustified risk”among other things because the prescription of hydroxychloroquine respected the doses usually recommended and because “he knowingly excluded (…) patients who presented the highest risk factors”.
Criticism of vaccination and confinement
Retired since the summer of 2021 from his position as a university professor and hospital practitioner, Didier Raoult, on the other hand, has been criticized for his study at the University Hospital Institute (IHU) of Marseille on around 30,000 patients without the green light from the health authorities, which would not respect the “scientific rigor”. Through his criticism of widespread vaccination and confinement, he “harmed by comments devoid of consideration of the measures taken by the health authorities for the purposes of protecting public health”also considers the Order of Physicians.
The sanction also targets the“absence of brotherhood” of Didier Raoult towards colleagues or other establishments. He held “comments going beyond the scope of freedom of expression”for example by contrasting its results with those of Parisian hospitals where “they counted the dead” or by claiming that another doctor had “conducted tests in which children died”.
A “blame” in December 2021
On December 3, 2021, the former director of IHU Méditerranée Infection was sent a “blame” by the disciplinary chamber of the Order of Physicians of Nouvelle-Aquitaine. It was then the second most important sanction after the simple warning and before the bans on practice, or even deregistration.
This chamber criticized the specialist in tropical diseases for having communicated “information that was not based on any confirmed data” by championing hydroxychloroquine. His lawyer, Me Fabrice Di Vizio, then estimated that this “slap on the wrist” was “a victory” for his client. A few days later, on December 17, the National Council of the Order of Physicians appealed, judging the sanction too lenient given “the seriousness of the breaches”.
“It’s communication, it’s surreal”
“It’s communication. We wonder if Salvador Dali is in charge, because it is surreal to prohibit medicine to a doctor who has not practiced for three years and who has withdrawn from the Council of the Order. It’s madnessmocks Didier Raoult to Le Figaro, claiming not to have been notified of the decision. From the very beginning, the known reality about hydroxychloroquine opposes why this sanction was imposed. The Council of the Order must be dissolved or new directives given to it. It should not be there to be the watchdog of governments, which it is today.”
On X, Fabrice Di Vizio also said this Thursday that he had not been able to read the decision.
Related News :