100 days of rupture, what assessment?

100 days after Trump’s return to the White House, the United States lives a break. Between promises and challenges, what is the real assessment? Click to discover …

One hundred days. It is the symbolic milestone that any president scrutinizes with apprehension, the one where the spotlights around the world turn to assess the first steps of a mandate. Since January 20, 2025, the United States has been experiencing a new era: the return of Donald Trump to the White House. Promising a radical break with the previous administration, he rocked the foundations of an already fractured nation. But after these three months, where are we really? Has expectations have met, or have the promises lost in the tumult?

A shattering return: Trump’s big bang

On January 20, Trump’s inauguration marked a turning point. In a fiery discourse, he promised to redraw America according to his vision: a sovereign, economically robust nation, detached from international constraints. On that day, thousands of supporters flocked to the streets of Washington, while others demonstrated their opposition. This contrast illustrates a reality: Trump remains a figure that divides deeply.

However, this return is not a simple rehearsal. Unlike his first mandate, he arrives with a sharp team, faithful allies and a clear strategy. But the challenges are immense: an economy under tension, increasing geopolitical tensions and a volatile public opinion. So what are the first markers of these 100 days?

Free fall popularity

The figures speak for themselves. With less than 40 % d’opinions favorables According to the latest polls, Trump crosses a zone of turbulence. This unusualness, unusual so early in a mandate, reflects dissatisfaction with still vague promises. The Americans, accustomed to rapid results, seem frustrated by the absence of concrete victories.

“People want change, but they also want results. For the moment, it’s calm before the storm. »»

An American political analyst

Several factors explain this early disenchantment. First, expectations were disproportionate. After a campaign focused on striking slogans, administrative reality has regained the upper hand. Then, media criticisms, described asenemies of the people By Trump, amplified tensions. Each misstep is scrutinized, each declaration dissected.

Immigration: a muscular policy

One of the pillars of the Trump program remains firmness on immigration. From the first few weeks, its administration multiplied shock announcements: strengthening border controls, threats of sanctions against sanctuary cities and, even more controversial, massive expulsions. These measures, although applauded by his supporters, aroused an uproar.

An episode particularly marked the spirits: the expulsion of three children, including a cancer, towards Honduras. This decision, perceived as inhuman by many, crystallized criticism against a policy deemed too rigid. Trump defenders, they see it as a necessary firmness in the face of a migratory system deemed lax.

Energy and environment: Goodbye Green Transition?

If the previous administration praised the energy transitionTrump has taken the opposite way. Upon his arrival, he relaunched oil and gas operating projects, while softening environmental regulations. This turn, praised by the energy industry, worries the defenders of the climate.

For Trump, the objective is clear: reducing energy dependence and stimulating the economy. But this choice has a cost. The United States, formerly leaders in climatic agreements, are likely to lose their international credibility. The young generations, particularly sensitive to these questions, could turn more away from the president.

Geopolitics: a withdrawal America

On the international scene, Trump surprised his pragmatism. While Ukraine awaited firm support, the White House declarations remained lukewarm. This posture, interpreted as a decline, has revived the debates on American engagement in world conflicts.

In parallel, Trump hardened the tone against China, while seeking to appease relationships with certain traditional allies. This strategy, described as transactionalaims to maximize profits for the United States. But she lets uncertainties: Can America become an undisputed leader again?

The media: an endless war

The relationship between Trump and the media remains explosive. By qualifying certain press organs ofenemies of the peoplehe rekindled an open war. This rhetoric, although unifying for its base, feeds polarization. The unfavorable polls, often relayed by these same media, have become a point of tension.

“The media do not forgive. Each word from Trump is a pretext for a new controversy. »»

A political commentator

This tension has a concrete impact: the confidence of Americans in media institutions is at its lowest historical. For Trump, it’s both a weapon and a trap. By marginalizing criticism, he strengthens his grip on his supporters, but alienates part of the moderate electorate.

And now ? The challenges to come

After these 100 days, Trump is at the crossroads. To straighten the bar, several sites are essential:

• Restore confidence : Reclaim a skeptical electorate by tangible results.
• Clarify priorities : Define a clear roadmap to avoid impression of dispersion.
• Soothe tensions : reduce polarization by addressing moderates.

The meeting in Michigan, where Trump celebrates these 100 days, will be scrutinized. This meeting, in front of thousands of supporters, could be an opportunity to revive the dynamics. But the challenges are colossal: an uncertain economy, a divided society and a world in boiling.

An America to the test

A hundred days, it is little in a four -year term. However, this CAP sets the tone. For Trump, the stake is clear: transform promises into results. His supporters are waiting for victories, his detractors are watching the faux pas. In this climate, a question dominates: what America will emerge from this mandate?

Between rupture and chaos, the results of these 100 days remain contrasting. The coming months will be decisive to judge whether Trump can redraw America in its image, or if the opposite winds will be right for its ambitions.